MLT Heading

MLT Newsletter

July, 1994

Alternative Visions
LOCALIZING FOOD SYSTEMS: A KEY TO HEALTHIER CITIES
by Kenneth A. Dahlberg

[Note: This is a somewhat expanded version of a piece published in The Neighborhood Works. February/March 1994, p.14,as part of a special issue dealing with urban food issues.  Subscriptions are available for $30 for six issues (plus two handbooks) from The Neighborhood Works, 2125 W. North Ave., Chicago, IL 60647; phone (312) 278-4800. Reprinted with permission.]

The restructuring of agriculture and rural regions required to move towards more sustainable agricultural and food systems also offers neighborhood and city reformers many possibilities to rethink, restructure, and localize their own food systems in order to make them healthier.  What restructuring?  What food systems?  Why localize?  my neighborhood activist friends ask.

What restructuring?  Current agriculture (national and international) is unsustainable.  Not only does it impose extremely high health, social, and environmental costs, but it is highly fossil-fuel dependent.  In the U.S. it takes roughly 10 energy calories to deliver 1 food calorie on our plates.  As fossil fuel prices rise, there will be a huge multiplier effect on food prices with resulting chaos throughout the food system if this happens quickly.  As we move into the post-fossil-fuel era, we can either wait until things collapse or start the necessary restructuring now.  This restructuring will greatly affect towns and cities as well as rural regions.

What food systems?  And what are they anyway?  It is not surprising that people raise these questions since most are aware only of production agriculture.  Most city dwellers, not to mention city planners, are otherwise illiterate when it comes to their local food system.  Few citizens or officials are aware of how dependent their city is upon distant national and international systems (public and private) for food and how vulnerable those systems are.  Neither are they aware of the extent and complexity of their local food systems, much less their potential and the need to develop that potential.  This is reflected in the fact that no U.S. city (or state) has a department of food.  Equally, few people are aware that the value of the produce from all U.S. gardens (urban and rural) is roughly equivalent to that of the corn crop (approximately $18 billion/year!).  Also, there is little awareness that agricultural, horticultural, and food-related activities constitute roughly 20-25% of a local economy (at least in those few regions where studies have been done).

What then are local food systems anyway?   The local part starts at the household level, and then expands to the neighborhood, municipal, and regional levels.  At each level there are different cycles, issues, problems, and possibilities.  The food part includes all the various social, symbolic, health, power, access, and equity dimensions (things that get minimal consideration in agriculture).  The systems part includes not just the production aspects of food (farmland preservation, farmers markets, household & community gardens), but processing issues (local vs. external), distribution issues (transportation, warehousing), access issues (inner city grocery stores, school breakfasts & lunches, food stamps, the WIC program, etc.), use issues (food safety and handling, restaurants, street vendors), food re-cycling (gleaning, food banks, food pantries and soup kitchens), and waste stream issues (composting, garbage fed to pigs, etc.).  Besides the social, economic, and environmental issues associated with the above, each also involves a number of ethical and value issues which need to be included in our understandings.

Why localize?  And what are the potential benefits?  Sustainable agriculturalists have called for localization to increase environmental sustainability and to develop and increase local markets and reduce dependence upon distant (and often erratic) markets.  Few of them have thought about the other components of local food systems outlined above or how localizing food systems and having more food grown locally and regionally for local consumption opens new opportunities for neighborhoods, towns, and cities to reduce social, environmental, and economic problems.  Such localization can help cities develop new ways to deal with problems of hunger, joblessness, urban decay, declining tax bases, and environmental degradation, plus help to meet the need for open and green spaces.

The vision of creating healthier, more localized and more sustainable food systems includes such things as:

*Providing both long-term food security and better health for all local residents by making a variety of safe and nutritious food available to all;
*Providing a cushion of self-reliance against transport strikes, major storms and disasters, and rising food prices resulting from oligopolies and/or rising fossil fuel prices and their multiplier effects;
*Providing continuing employment for local farmers, horticulturalists, and food workers;
*Empowering households and neighborhoods and making them more self-reliant by making more land, work, and employment available throughout the food system;
*Recycling and freeing up more local dollars for local development by increasing the energy and resource efficiency of local food systems, especially by reducing energy costs and recycling organic wastes into productive uses rather than putting them in expensive landfills;
*Creating a healthier, more diverse, and pleasant environment for ourselves and our grandchildren by cleaning up air, water, and soil systems and creating more green spaces and more diverse rural landscapes, while at the same time reducing health costs and pollution clean up costs;
*Reducing the dependence of people on emergency hunger and feeding programs by moving towards hunger prevention programs.

How do we go about creating healthier local and regional food systems? At a personal level we can grow, process, and preserve more of our own food. We can buy local food from farmers markets and u-picks,  We can join a community supported agriculture organization.  As citizens, we can support innovative neighborhood and municipal programs and organizations.  One exciting example has involved the creation of food policy councils.  They have sought to improve their local food systems not only by coordinating and/or networking actions, but by making policy recommendations, organizing groups, testifying and/or lobbying, conducting or sponsoring policy research, and doing many other creative things.

The types of issues they have addressed include the following. Production: promoting household & community gardens; seeking to preserve local farmers and farmland; promoting community supported agriculture.  Processing: encouraging local food processing plants as well as household and community canning programs.  Distribution: promoting full use of available government programs (school breakfasts; food stamps; WIC, etc.); coordinating emergency feeding systems (food pantries; soup kitchens, food banks, etc.); ensuring availability of inner city supermarkets; encouraging local farmers markets and promoting local produce.  Use: promoting healthy and nutritious diets and meal preparation.  Recycling and composting: encouraging this throughout all phases of the food system.  Waste disposal: using creative approaches to minimize the wastes generated in each stage of the food system.

Until recently, we have been blind to the importance of food in local and regional environments and economies.  The emerging crises of sustainability will require us to shape and fit current fragments and pieces into genuine and sustainable food systems.  With vision, we can also do this in a way that will simultaneously empower families and neighborhoods, reduce many local problems and costs, and make our communities healthier, more self-reliant and equitable.



Self-reliance Without Zeal:  A Confessional
by Mike Phillips
"It's okay to fart around."  --Kurt Vonnegut, 1993

Last -week it took me nearly seven hours to put up 32 quarts of strawberries—that included 16 pints of jam and a gallon and a half of cordial.*  I made quite a mess and both of my thumbs got sore from gouging caps.  I kept thinking that for ten or twelve dollars I could probably buy a case of strawberry jam at Sam's Club.  Then again, I hate shopping; and there's that tinge of satisfaction every time I go into the pantry and see a growing number of Mason Jars.  I don't mean to imply that Mason jars out number the things we buy from the store, simply that there are more than there were previously.

I wish that I had a passion for homesteading.  (I come from a long line of tract house dwellers.)  In the past ten years, Lisa and I have always grown vegetables and cut fire wood from our woods.  I've planted a lot of trees and other perennials, including a vineyard and a small orchard sitting on top of hard-packed clay that always escapes frost-freeze but has yet to yield fruit.  There's chickens in the barn, fresh eggs in the refrigerator and roasters in the freezer.  Condense the past decade into a few sentences and you'd think we're destined for the cover of Harrowsmith/Country Life.  (I don't even like to read that stuff.)  We aren't that self-reliant.  Any family with the impetus would have done in four years what it took us ten to do.   I don't even like gardening all that much, and I've put 100 times more effort into lounging on the couch picking my guitar than tending to chickens, fruits, and vegetables. Nonetheless, our household economy grows a little each year.

I've found that the modicum of effort put into food preservation—even an occasional seven hour stretch at the kitchen sink—still leaves plenty of time for child rearing, careers, and loafing.  In fact, the best part about living in the country is sitting in the shade on the front porch reading or writing a letter and distracted only by the din of children playing and songbirds marking territory.

Our neighbors are much more enthusiastic homesteaders than we are and they help drag us along.  This year we got most of our vegetable flats form the people next door.  (They got the use of our roto tiller.)  Our other neighbors to the south took it upon themselves to organize a community garden since they have access to a tractor with a cultivator.  So, there's two acres of sweetcorn sitting there that will soon be divided between five households.  It seems to me that any attempt at self-reliance is contingent upon having good neighbors.

Sometimes I fear—especially when I think about the safety record of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant, 35 miles northwest as the crow flies—that civilization has run amuck and that self-reliance is our only sane response if we envision any just and sustainable future.  I feel a bit sheepish that I'm not doing more to hold up my end of such a noble endeavor.

I keep plugging away.  I try to break down "self-provisioning" (Maynard Kaufman's term and an apt description) into small tasks so I won't get overwhelmed--you couldn't give me a milk cow.  If it becomes an innate part of housework it's not such an ordeal. That's how I was able to spend seven hours putting up strawberries. Hell, if I had to think about it, I probably wouldn't do it.

*Sally Kaufman's Cordials

(This is a slight variation from the recipe
Lisa got from Sally many years ago.)

Combine:  5-6 cups crushed berries (black caps,
cherries, raspberries, et al)
1.75 liters cheap vodka
2 cups water
5 cups sugar
Mix together for 10 to thirty days (One gallon
wide mouthed glass jars work well); strain;
wait one month or more and rack off into
decanters.  Makes an excellent after dinner liqueur.



The MLT Homesteading Farm has been purchased by Jon Towne and Bobbi Martindale.  The 38 acre parcel was         sold on land contract for $40,000 with $10,000 down and the balance to be paid over the next ten years at 7% with a no prepayment penalty option.

The income generated from the sale of the farm has allowed the MLT Board of Directors to informally commit to
help finance the Michigan Organic Food and Farm Alliance (MOFFA). The Board approved $3,000 in February, and $3,500 in April of this year.  Another $3,500 will be made available to the organization in the fall contingent upon a favorable update.  Optimally, MOFFA will eventually obtain foundation support.  (For an overview of MOFFA and our role, please refer to the January MLT newsletter.)

The Bangor area Local Exchange Trading System (LETS) started up in May with 22 active members.  The bartering program was featured in the Benton Harbor Herald-Palladium back in March.  On Sunday, July 31, 1994 there will be a LETS Fair at the farm of Maynard Kaufman and Barbara Geisler from 3 to 5 pm.  Following will be a potluck and then the MLT meeting.  All are welcome. 

Our protracted writing/poetry contest is over.  As you may recall, the contest had two objectives:  First, we hoped to come up with a name or slogan that would [romantically] promote community self-reliance and local economic viability as exemplified by the LETS program.  Second, since we are groping with the broad cultural changes of our time, we are in search of "...a new poetic mythology. The call was put forth, a group of judges was assembled, and we waited for entries.  There were five.  Unfortunately, none of the submissions interested or inspired the judges.  So, a "consolation prize" of $25 will be sent to all five participants.  Meanwhile, we'll continue to grope.

--Mike Phillips, Editor

Back to MLT Newsletter Page